Imtiyaz R. Chashti
India today faces a paradox. Even as the nation projects confidence, ambition, and unity on the global stage, its digital spaces are increasingly consumed by anger, provocation, and manufactured hatred. Online hate, spanning religious, ethnic, caste-based, and regional lines, has moved well beyond the margins to become a systemic challenge to our public life. Platforms like Twitter (X), YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram are no longer neutral forums of debate; they have become arenas where algorithms reward outrage and division over dialogue and responsibility.
This goes far beyond the question of offensive speech. For a civilization-state like India, founded on pluralism and constitutional fraternity, unchecked online hate is a matter of national consequence. It corrodes social trust, strains cohesion, and opens fault lines that hostile forces, both internal and external, are quick to exploit.
Recent data paints a disturbing picture. In 2024 alone, hate speech incidents in India reportedly rose by over 74 percent compared to the previous year, with more than 1,100 documented events. The overwhelming majority targeted religious minorities, particularly Muslims, often accompanied by calls that went beyond criticism into dehumanization. These were not spontaneous expressions of anger; many were coordinated, amplified through rallies, influencers, and digital ecosystems designed to provoke maximum reaction.
What makes this trend truly alarming is the machinery that sustains it: hate is broadcast live, packaged into clips, amplified through shares, and monetized. Clear violations rarely result in takedowns, reinforcing the idea that outrage is profitable and responsibility optional.
The failure is not limited to tech companies. Law enforcement responses remain uneven and slow. While laws exist to penalize incitement and acts prejudicial to national integration, their application is selective. When perpetrators enjoy political patronage, social capital, or large online followings, enforcement often hesitates. Meanwhile, those who react sometimes emotionally, sometimes angrily are swiftly booked. This asymmetry breeds resentment and reinforces the belief that power, not law, determines accountability.
A nation cannot afford such moral confusion. Hate cannot be excused as nationalism. True nationalism is not about humiliating fellow citizens or reducing communities to stereotypes. It is about preserving unity, dignity, and order. History teaches us that societies collapse not only due to external aggression, but because internal cohesion is corroded from within.
The consequences of digital hate are no longer theoretical. India has already witnessed how online rumors and fear campaigns have translated into mob violence and lynchings. WhatsApp-forced hysteria and viral misinformation have cost innocent lives. Each such incident chips away at India’s social fabric and damages its democratic credibility.
The question, then, is unavoidable: how long will the Indian State allow digital spaces to be weaponised against its own people?
Reclaiming the digital republic is a matter of national interest. India needs clear, modern laws specifically addressing online hate and coordinated digital incitement. Cyber crime units must be strengthened, not merely in numbers but in capacity and autonomy. Suo motu action against viral hate content should become standard practice, not an exception dependent on public outrage.
Equally important is platform accountability. Companies that profit from Indian users must respect Indian laws and constitutional values. Transparency in moderation, swift takedowns, and cooperation with lawful investigations are not concessions—they are obligations.
Finally, citizens too have an essential role to play. A strong and confident Bharat is not built by suppressing debate, but by upholding dignity in disagreement. Freedom of expression flourishes when anchored in civic responsibility. Digital literacy, constitutional values, and ethical communication must therefore become integral to our public culture. India’s enduring strength has always been its capacity to accommodate diversity without yielding to disorder. Allowing algorithm-driven hostility to shape public discourse would be a departure from that legacy. As India advances along its development trajectory and towards its aspirations as a global power, it must act with firmness and clarity, not to silence voices, but to safeguard the Republic from forces that thrive on discord and undermine social harmony.
P.S.: Rebuttals, comments, and reasoned responses are welcome and may be shared at: imtiyazchashti@gmail.com
Breaking the Balance: How Inequality Fractures Progress. Opinion 22 December 2025
When Autumn Trees Still Wait for Spring: The Silent Longing of Old Age Parents, opinion 1 December 2025
Reimagining Education with Tech , opinion 24 November 2025
Reimagining Education with Tech
By Dr Aqib
E-learning can play a vital role in restructuring the education system of our country. The current system is traditional and can be improved in many ways among which, e-learning stands out as one of the most transformative. The conventional face-to-face learning approach can effectively be blended with online learning to create a more dynamic and flexible educational model. Online learning can be both synchronous and asynchronous, allowing for adaptability and inclusiveness.
This approach offers many benefits such as wider accessibility, improved engagement, increased interaction, flexible course design, better management of time and resources, and lower costs. However, it also presents some challenges, including the lack of direct face-to-face communication, the need for stronger self-discipline, and additional workload for instructors.
A variety of digital platforms such as Moodle, Blackboard, WebCT, Adobe Captivate, Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack can support e-learning. These platforms help in managing courses, delivering lessons, assessing learners, and facilitating communication. For teaching to be effective, instructors must also focus on building essential skills such as digital literacy, organizational ability, time management, and creativity to inspire continuous learning and progress.
Online courses should be carefully designed to encourage collaboration among learners and instructors. Clear learning outcomes aligned with curriculum goals must be established. Using action-oriented verbs like “describe,” “demonstrate,” “outline,” “design,” and “create” helps make objectives measurable and effective.
Instructors can create engaging virtual content through tools such as Vituou, MERLOT, Nearpod, Wikibooks, Di
Technology should be used to facilitate participation, enable collaboration, and enhance creativity. Following the SAMR model Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition can help transform teaching and learning experiences. Similarly, Bloom’s Taxonomy provides a strong framework for structuring e-learning through its focus on remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
Collaborative tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack can further strengthen interaction, allowing students to learn from one another, solve problems collectively, and develop teamwork and communication skills.
Assessment in e-learning should be both formative and summative. Formative assessments can include quizzes, discussions, assignments, and peer feedback, while summative assessments can take the form of final exams, projects, or comprehensive evaluations. These assessments should measure not only knowledge acquisition but also the learner’s ability to apply and extend that knowledge.
In conclusion, technology should not merely supplement education but should reshape it. By thoughtfully integrating digital tools into the learning process, we can bridge the gap between traditional and modern education truly putting the “tech” in teaching.
Whispers of the Vanished Woods, opinion 17 November 2025
Whispers of the Vanished Woods
How Kashmir’s Forests Fell to Greed and Silence.
By Dr Noour Ali Zehgeer
The earlier parts of this series peeled away the layers of Kashmir’s land crisis — the reckless ownership drives under the Roshni Act, the quiet theft of Pandit homes during the dark 1990s, and the abandoned fields left in bureaucratic limbo since Partition. But perhaps nothing wounds deeper than the story of the forests — those sacred green lungs that once wrapped the Valley in life, shelter, and serenity.
Once, Kashmir’s woods were more than trees. They were guardians of rivers, homes to animals, shields against hunger and flood. The revered saint-poet Sheikh-ul-Alam had warned centuries ago, “Ann poshi teli yeli wan poshi” — food lasts only as long as forests last. Today, those words echo like a lament over bare hillsides and dried riverbeds.
When the fires of militancy swept across Kashmir in the early 1990s, governance vanished overnight. The forest guards disappeared, offices were torched, and the rule of law dissolved into fear. At first, the loss seemed harmless — villagers cutting a few trees for firewood or clearing small patches to grow crops. But as chaos deepened, greed found its chance. Armed men, traders, and desperate villagers together turned the forests into open loot.
By night, gunshots were followed by the rumble of trucks. Deodar and pine, the Valley’s prized giants, were felled and shipped away — some to city markets, others to military camps. Even the forces, it was whispered, took their share. “Everyone had their reason,” says a retired forest guard from Budgam. “For some, it was survival; for others, power.”
Between 1990 and 2010, over five lakh mature trees vanished from Budgam’s Sitharan range alone. Across Kashmir, satellite data shows the Valley losing more than 152 square kilometres of forest cover since 1989. The wounds of that loss still bleed — in swollen rivers, eroded hills, and the choking air that once carried the scent of pine. During 1990 to 2008, the natural resource of this valley was looted, the insensitive businessman of the valley grabbed every commercially viable land to create fortunes for there family. The politicians were alibi to their crimes yet silent and waiting for their shares rather than legally stopping them. So called these Pakistan sponsored militants were part of parcel of this loot which made Valley a barren land, they also made fortunes without caring for our generations to come.
If Trees don’t return to Kashmir, in Next 20yrs we will see our children suffering and making their future dark
From Kral Sangri to Kupwara, the story repeats itself — quiet villages turned into settlements of stumps and stones. “We thought we were taking what was ours,” recalls an elderly villager, staring at the concrete where oak trees once stood. “But we took away our children’s shade.”
When democracy returned in 1996, the damage was already deep. The Public Safety Act (PSA) — once meant to deal with threats to peace — was extended to forest smugglers. Yet the powerful remained untouched. Timber mafias became donors, and politics turned green crime into patronage. “Forests paid for elections,” a former officer remark bitterly.
As of September 2025, official data reveals 19,501 hectares of forest land — nearly 3.9 lakh kanals — encroached across Jammu and Kashmir. Of this, 5,891 hectares lie in Kashmir alone, with the South Circle (Anantnag to Awantipora) worst affected. The pattern is unmistakable: illegal felling under the shadow of development, silence under the pretext of progress.
The 1990s saw timber smuggling evolve into an organized industry. Militants levied “forest taxes,” and smugglers, protected by fear or favour, stripped the woods bare. In places like Tosamaidan, leased to the army in 1964, lakhs of deodars disappeared under the cover of military activity. “We cut to survive,” admits Javed Ahmad, a former smuggler from Budgam. “The militants took their share, and the rest went unseen.”
By the early 2000s, over 84,000 kanals had already been seized. Today, that number has tripled. The victims aren’t just trees — they are people too. From Kupwara’s nomadic Gujjars, who now wander parched pastures, to widows in Kral Sangri who lost homes to the 2014 floods, everyone has paid the price. The Jhelum, once a calm vein of the Valley, now clogs with mud from naked hillsides.
The environmental toll is immense. Studies show a 2°C rise in average night temperatures since 1990 and a steady increase in flash floods and landslides. The Hangul deer — Kashmir’s pride — teeters on the edge of extinction. Medicinal herbs once common in Verinag or Doda now exist only in memories.
Though efforts to reclaim encroached land have begun — with 14.28 lakh kanals retrieved out of 17.22 lakh — the pace is painfully slow. The Forest Protection Force, armed and alert, clears only a few hundred hectares a year. Technology has entered the fight: satellite monitoring, tip-off apps, and drone surveys. But against entrenched corruption and political apathy, such steps barely scratch the surface.
Ironically, even institutions meant to protect are part of the problem. Camps, government offices, and even tourist resorts have been built on forest land. In Dachigam National Park, a proposed CRPF camp threatens to erase habitats of the endangered Hangul. Each new construction is defended as “national interest,” yet each leaf behind another scar.
What’s needed now is courage — and honesty. Kashmir must publish the names of the encroachers, prosecute the powerful, and protect the weak who cut only to live. Forest-dependent communities should be partners, not targets. Projects like REDD+, which reward conservation, could offer new hope if implemented sincerely. Climate change is reshaping Kashmir’s ecology, economy, and daily life—triggering erratic weather, shrinking water bodies, and threatening traditional livelihoods like saffron farming. What the UT government should do is Train youth in climate literacy, disaster response, and green entrepreneurship. Co-create tech-enabled solutions for crop resilience, soil monitoring, and market access. Empower youth to draft climate adaptation policies and engage with local governance bodies.
But in Kashmir, votes still weigh heavier than virtue. Parties trade slogans over bulldozers, yet none speak of the 19,000 hectares already lost. “We took from nature,” says an ex-smuggler now turned forest guide in Tosa maidan, “and she is taking back from us.”
The civil society has also done very little for awareness of not cutting down trees, they are tight lipped like corporate houses of Jammu and Kashmir who could have done a lot under CSR programs. Irony is Kashmiri people themselves are responsible for this mess ,and no one can deny that locals have looted the forest reserves and put generations to come in climate change danger.
The message is clear — if the trees do not return, neither will life as we knew it. The winds that once carried the fragrance of cedar now whisper a warning: we are running out of green, and out of time.
Why Should Men Never Argue With Women? The Bridge Between Emotion and Logic
and LogicIt is one of the oldest and most enduring sources of friction between the sexes: a conversation that starts with good intentions and swiftly spirals into a confounding clash of worlds. He says one thing; she hears another. She expresses a feeling; he offers a solution. The result is a familiar stalemate: she feels unheard, and he feels misunderstood. The common, albeit flippant, advice that “men should never argue with women” is not a surrender of reason or a suggestion of female irrationality. Rather, it is a crude, oversimplified banner for a profound and necessary truth. The path to harmony lies not in avoiding conflict, but in fundamentally understanding that men and women often speak different, yet equally valid, native languages—the language of logic and the language of emotion.
A great deal of interpersonal conflict stems from this fundamental divergence in communication processing. From a young age, many boys are socialized to be problem-solvers. They are taught to suppress overt emotion, to be stoic, and to value action over feeling. Their world is often one of structure, hierarchy, and fixable problems. This upbringing forges a mind that, when confronted with a issue, instinctively reaches for logic. It is a toolkit for navigating the world, a way to create order from chaos. When his partner shares a problem, his deeply ingrained response is to diagnose the issue and prescribe a remedy. He is, in his mind, being helpful, protective, and engaged.
Women, on the other hand, are often socialized within a different framework. They are frequently permitted, and even encouraged, to develop a rich and nuanced emotional vocabulary. For many, emotions are not a messy byproduct of thought but the very medium through which thought is processed in real time. Articulating feelings is not merely about venting; it is a method of exploration, a way to untangle complex internal experiences by giving them voice. When she shares a problem, she is often engaging in this very process—she is thinking out loud, connecting the emotional dots, and seeking validation and connection.
The challenge, and the primary source of so many arguments, arises when these two native languages collide. When she speaks from her heart, sharing the frustration of her day, and he responds with a step-by-step plan to fix it, a profound disconnect occurs. She interprets his logical blueprint as a dismissal of her feelings, as if he is saying, “Your emotions are an illogical problem to be solved, not a valid experience to be shared.” He, in turn, is baffled by her rejection of his help. He offered a perfectly good solution, and his efforts were met with tears or anger. He feels unappreciated and ineffective, wondering why she brought him the problem if she did not want it fixed. This is the crux of the misinterpretation: he mistakes her request for empathy as a request for advice.
The key to bridging this divide is for both parties to learn that emotion and logic are not enemies locked in a battle for supremacy. They are two essential instruments in the orchestra of human understanding, and a beautiful symphony requires both. The goal is not for one to convert to the other’s language, but to become bilingual, to develop the empathy and patience to listen for the meaning behind the words.
For a man, this requires a conscious shift in focus. His strength is not just in building solutions but in providing a sanctuary of understanding. He must learn to listen with empathy, which is an active and engaged practice of feeling with her, rather than acting upon her feelings. This means resisting the powerful instinct to troubleshoot and instead practicing simple, validating responses. It means understanding that sometimes, perhaps even most of the time, she does not need a mechanic for her soul; she needs a witness to her experience. His calm, steady presence in the face of emotional storms is not passivity; it is a powerful form of support. By holding space without immediately trying to dispel the discomfort, he makes her feel safe, seen, and profoundly understood. This requires him to value her emotional reality as much as he values his logical one, recognizing that what may not make linear sense to him is the very substance of her present truth. Respecting her feelings in this way is the cornerstone of building deep, unshakable trust.
For a woman, the path forward involves a parallel shift in interpretation. It is crucial to recognize that his logical, solution-oriented response is rarely a cold dismissal. More often than not, it is his language of care. When he immediately starts brainstorming fixes, he is operating from a place of deep-seated instinct to protect and provide. He is trying to build a levee against the river of her distress. Understanding this intention can reframe his response from one of indifference to one of devoted, if misplaced, concern. To help him learn her language, she can assist by communicating her needs with clarity. A simple, gentle directive can work wonders: “I just need you to listen right now, I’m not ready for solutions,” or, “I value your advice, could you help me think this through?” This clear signaling prevents the dangerous game of assumption, where she hopes he will just know what she needs, and he is left guessing incorrectly. Furthermore, she can learn to respect his steady, calm presence as his unique form of strength. His silence or measured words are not always a sign of detachment; often, they are his way of creating stability and containing the situation, of being the anchor in the storm.
Ultimately, the old adage is wrong. Men should not “never argue with women.” In fact, avoiding difficult conversations is a recipe for resentment and distance. The real imperative is to transform the argument itself. A true, productive conversation between a man and a woman is not a battle to be won with superior logic or emotional intensity. It is a collaborative project to build a bridge. He must take a step onto the bridge from the shore of logic, and she must take a step from the shore of emotion. They meet in the middle, in a space where feelings are honored as the context and logic is valued as a tool. When both sides make the effort to respect and learn the other’s native tongue, communication ceases to be a source of conflict and becomes the very foundation of a deeper, more intimate, and unshakable connection.
Author is a surgeon, Contributes with positive perception management on socio moral issues .
—
Senior Consultant Surgeon (Surgical Gastroenterology; Onco-
How to Love Your Spouse Unconditionally, opinion 10 November,2025
A Love Without Preconditions!.
By Dr. Fiaz Maqbool Fazili
Love in marriage, much like life itself, is never static. It breathes, evolves, and sometimes bleeds under the weight of unmet expectations and human flaws. The idea of loving someone unconditionally—especially a spouse—is often glorified in poetry, religion, and philosophy, yet rarely practiced in the daily grind of shared existence. Unconditional love is not a sentimental phrase or a romantic illusion; it is a deliberate, disciplined act of the heart. It means giving your partner what they need the most, when they deserve it the least, at great personal cost to yourself.
When I first heard those words more than three decades ago, they struck me as both profound and painfully demanding. At the time, I was a young husband, navigating the uncharted territory of marriage with all the impatience and ego of youth. Those words, however, became a quiet compass—guiding me through arguments, disappointments, and moments of emotional drought. They taught me that love without conditions is not about perfection or permanent harmony. It is about choosing your partner, every day, especially when they are hardest to love. In a world increasingly defined by transient connections and conditional agreements, the sanctity of marital love faces unprecedented challenges. This piece explores the profound, often difficult, yet ultimately transformative practice of loving a spouse without conditions—a journey not of perfection, but of persistent, grace-filled choice. It is a reflection drawn from decades of lived experience, offered not as a prescription, but as a testament to the enduring power of a love that chooses to see, accept, and cherish.
Marriage, by its very nature, tests the elasticity of love. It places two imperfect individuals under the same emotional roof and asks them to build a life together. There are seasons when everything feels effortless—when laughter fills the kitchen, when plans align, and when the smallest gestures feel enough. But there are also days when silence stretches longer than words, when fatigue replaces affection, and when both partners feel unseen or misunderstood. It is in those fragile spaces that unconditional love either takes root or withers.
To love your spouse unconditionally is not to ignore their flaws or excuse their mistakes. It is to accept their humanity and choose to see the whole person—the good, the difficult, and the growing. It means extending grace, not as an act of surrender, but as a conscious expression of strength. True love is not about fixing someone; it is about standing beside them as they evolve.
Society often measures love by reciprocity—the give-and-take that keeps relationships balanced. But unconditional love transcends that equation. It gives without keeping score. Yet, this does not mean self-erasure or tolerating emotional neglect. Loving without conditions does not mean living without boundaries. In fact, setting boundaries is often an act of love, both for yourself and for your spouse. When you continue to give endlessly without being emotionally nourished in return, you eventually drain your spirit. Love cannot thrive in an environment where only one heart beats for two.
The idea of unconditional love finds its most perfect expression in divine example. The scriptures remind us that love is patient, kind, and enduring—not because it is blind to faults, but because it chooses compassion over judgment. God’s love for humanity is not transactional; it is steadfast even in the face of betrayal and weakness. That sacred model of love is not meant to burden us with impossible ideals, but to remind us that love can indeed be both strong and forgiving at once.
Marriage offers the closest human opportunity to practice that divine kind of love. When we forgive, when we listen instead of reacting, when we show up in the midst of disappointment, we mirror something larger than ourselves. It is not a weakness to love deeply; it is a rare courage to do so when circumstances test your patience and pride.
In the daily rhythm of marriage, unconditional love often manifests in the smallest acts. Respecting your spouse’s opinions even when you disagree, listening with empathy, believing in their abilities, and encouraging them in moments of self-doubt—these gestures weave the quiet fabric of enduring love. When you speak about your partner with respect in front of others, when you make time for them despite the chaos of life, you are telling them that they matter, that they are seen. Love is not a grand declaration; it is in the consistency of everyday tenderness.
To love unconditionally is also to allow imperfection. Letting your spouse fail, make mistakes, or struggle without judgment is part of this sacred dance. Control may feel like security, but it often suffocates growth. When you step back and give them the space to fall and rise again, you are not losing power—you are nurturing partnership. You are saying, “I trust you to find your way, and I will still be here when you do.”
Encouragement, too, is a language of love. Be their loudest cheerleader, not their harshest critic. Celebrate their victories, however small, and acknowledge their efforts even when outcomes fall short. Gratitude has a quiet magic—it transforms ordinary moments into emotional connection. Saying “thank you” or “I love you” may sound simple, but those words have the power to remind your partner that they are cherished and valued.
Of course, none of this comes without struggle. Unconditional love demands humility, patience, and self-awareness. It asks us to confront our own egos, our need to control, and our fear of being vulnerable. It is far easier to love when love is reciprocated. But the real measure of love is how it behaves when tested—when it must stand alone, fueled only by commitment and faith.
I still remember a time when my marriage felt weighed down by silence and fatigue. I taped that quote—“Unconditional love is giving the other person what they need the most, when they deserve it the least, at great personal cost to yourself”—to my bathroom mirror. I read it every morning before stepping into the day. It reminded me that love is not an emotion to be felt, but a decision to be made. It reminded me that I was called to love my wife not because she was perfect, but because she was mine.
Over the years, that lesson has deepened. I have realized that unconditional love is not a single act, but a lifelong practice. It requires forgiveness that goes beyond apology, understanding that precedes explanation, and faith that transcends disappointment. It is the slow, steady choice to nurture a bond even when it feels easier to retreat.
When the dust of daily life settles, when careers shift and appearances fade, what remains is the quiet companionship built through decades of shared resilience. To love your spouse unconditionally is to see beauty in the ordinary, to hold space for each other’s humanity, and to continue reaching across the distance when words fail.
At the end of every long day, when I turn to the person who has walked beside me through storms and seasons, I am reminded of one truth: love that asks for nothing in return often gives back the most. It may not always look perfect, but it endures. It grows through grace. It redeems through time. And in that unspoken endurance lies the purest form of love—a love without conditions.
Director HealthServices HSCT JK;Chief Adviser Healthcare,policy,Plans and Projects
Newspaper and Social media Columnist, blogger Healthcare(cancer awareness & prevention) Improvement of Healthcare-standards ,Safety; Moral Ethics in healthcare & hospital. Senior Consultant Surgeon,Clinical auditor
Adviosr Hospital & Healthcare Policy Planning; Patient safety &Quality care(QPS) Improvement.
India and the Taliban- Realpolitik or a Real Risk?,opinion 27 October
India and the Taliban: Realpolitik or a Real Risk?
By Dr Noour Ali Zehgeer
India’s recent engagement with the Taliban’s Foreign Minister — a UN-sanctioned individual — has stirred both curiosity and controversy in equal measure. For New Delhi, this outreach might seem like realpolitik — a pragmatic move dictated by shifting geopolitical currents in South and Central Asia. Yet for many observers, it raises a deeper, more uncomfortable question: Has India compromised its principles for the sake of strategic convenience?
The meeting, though perhaps inevitable in the new regional reality, has reopened a moral and diplomatic debate about how far India is willing to go to safeguard its interests — and at what cost.
A Breach of Trust?
For decades, Afghanistan and India shared a relationship built on trust, empathy, and shared history. India wasn’t just another regional player; it was a reliable partner, often referred to by Afghans as an elder brother — a nation that stood by them in times of conflict and instability. From building hospitals and roads to investing in education and governance, India’s development assistance made it a symbol of peace in a war-torn land.
Thus, this recent engagement with the Taliban — a regime that seized power through violence, suppresses women’s rights, and continues to shelter extremist elements — feels to many like a betrayal of that legacy. The people of Afghanistan, who have long admired India’s democratic values and secular ethos, now find themselves questioning whether the world’s largest democracy has begun to compromise with forces that embody everything it once opposed.
This meeting also appears to contradict India’s longstanding policy of zero tolerance for terrorism. How does a nation that refuses dialogue with terrorist organizations justify sitting across the table from a UN-sanctioned minister of a government still struggling for legitimacy?
It’s a fair question — one that cuts to the core of India’s foreign policy identity.
The Realpolitik Argument
Yet, from another angle, this engagement may not be betrayal but strategic necessity. The Taliban, whether the world likes it or not, currently represents the de facto government of Afghanistan. To ignore them would mean ceding influence in a region where China, Pakistan, Iran, and Russia are already manoeuvring
Diplomacy, after all, is not about friendships; it’s about interests. India, guided by a “nation-first” principle, cannot afford to let ideology cloud its strategic vision. Engaging with the Taliban doesn’t mean endorsing their ideology — it means acknowledging political reality.
Moreover, this isn’t the first time India has spoken to adversaries. New Delhi has engaged Pakistan several times despite its long history of sponsoring terrorism. The difference here is that India is not recognizing the Taliban regime formally; it’s testing the waters, ensuring its interests — particularly in trade, connectivity, and counterterrorism — are not undermined by exclusion.
In the game of geopolitics, moral clarity often collides with strategic necessity. The Indian establishment knows that isolationism achieves little. A seat at the table, however uncomfortable, is often better than shouting from outside the room.
Who Really Gains?
Still, one must ask: Who benefits most from this meeting?
For the Taliban, this engagement is a diplomatic victory. It lends them a veneer of legitimacy they have been desperately seeking. Being received by one of the world’s major powers — especially one that has long championed democratic values — allows them to project an image of acceptance to the global community.
For Afghanistan’s neighbors like Pakistan and China, India’s move might come as both surprise and concern. New Delhi, by reopening communication lines, signals that it refuses to be cut out of regional equations. It’s a way of saying: India is still here, and still matters.
For India, however, the gains are less immediate. Yes, the meeting may open avenues for intelligence sharing, trade routes, or humanitarian assistance. It could help ensure that Afghan soil isn’t used for anti-India terror activities. But these are still ifs and maybes.
The real test will be whether such outreach translates into tangible outcomes — or whether it ends up as another well-intentioned diplomatic gesture that history quietly shelves away.
Principle vs. Pragmatism
At the heart of this issue lies a timeless dilemma: Should foreign policy be guided by moral conviction or national interest? India’s engagement with the Taliban isn’t about endorsement; it’s about influence. Yet, in trying to secure that influence, there’s a risk of eroding the very moral high ground that has defined India’s global image for decades. The line between engagement and legitimization is perilously thin — and one misstep could blur it beyond repair.
Still, one must also acknowledge that the geopolitical landscape has changed. The world is not divided into heroes and villains anymore. Power dynamics are fluid, alliances are temporary, and every country is recalibrating its approach to survive in a multipolar world.
India, therefore, must walk this tightrope — balancing ideals with interests, compassion with caution.
The Final Word
So, is India’s meeting with the Taliban a betrayal or a masterstroke? Perhaps it’s a bit of both.
It’s betrayal if seen through the lens of sentiment — of friendship, loyalty, and shared values with the Afghan people.
It’s strategy if viewed through the prism of national interest and regional survival.
The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between.
India’s challenge now is not just to engage with the Taliban but to ensure that such engagement does not compromise its principles or global reputation. The world is watching — and so are the Afghan people, who once looked to India not just for power, but for hope.
- In diplomacy, as in life, sometimes the hardest part isn’t meeting your enemy — it’s not losing yourself in the process.

Respect for Parents , opinion 20 October 2025
Respect for Parents — Especially in Old Age
Modern Times — Busy Lives, Forgotten Bonds,Values ignored
By Dr. Fiaz Maqbool Fazili
In every religion, culture, and civilization, reverence for parents stands as one of the most sacred moral duties. It forms the foundation of humanity and defines the moral health of a society. Yet Islam raises this obligation from the realm of social ethics to that of divine worship. The Qur’an makes this relationship inseparable from the faith itself: “Your Lord has decreed that you worship none but Him, and that you be kind to your parents.” This verse places obedience to parents immediately after obedience to Allah. It is not merely advice; it is a command — a reflection of divine will. To honor one’s parents, therefore, is not an act of courtesy but an act of worship.
The Season of Their Fragility-In childhood, our parents are our shield — they protect, nurture, and provide. But as they grow old, the shield weakens, the hands that once guided begin to tremble, and the voices that once instructed now seek reassurance. This is the stage when duty reverses — the child becomes the guardian. Yet, in today’s world of busyness and distraction, many fail to recognize this sacred moment. The Qur’an beautifully instructs: “If one or both of them reach old age while with you, do not even say ‘uff’ to them, nor rebuke them, but speak to them with gentleness and honor.”The Arabic expression “uff” may seem small, but it represents every sigh of annoyance, every gesture of irritation, and every trace of disrespect. Islam, in its unmatched depth of compassion, forbids even the faintest sign of impatience toward one’s parents.
When Parents Weep, Heaven Watches-The tears of a parent, especially when caused by the harshness of a child, do not go unnoticed by the heavens. The Prophet Muhammad saw said:
“The father is the middle gate of Paradise; lose it if you wish, or preserve it.” In another Hadith, he warned: “The pleasure of Allah lies in the pleasure of the father, and His displeasure lies in the father’s displeasure.” What greater testimony could there be to the sacredness of parental love? To please one’s parents is to please Allah Himself; to hurt them is to risk divine wrath. A parent’s pain echoes in eternity, and their silent prayers — or their silent grief — can shape a child’s destiny.
The Sin That Weighs Heavily-The Prophet Muhammad saw included disobedience to parents among the gravest of sins:“The greatest sins are associating partners with Allah and disobedience to parents.” To disregard or disrespect one’s parents, therefore, is no small moral lapse — it is a spiritual disaster. The gravity of this sin lies not only in words or actions but also in indifference. The child who neglects an aging parent, who turns away when their voice calls, commits a silent form of cruelty.
The Power of Words-Language carries the weight of the heart. The Qur’an commands: “Speak to them words of kindness.” . Words can soothe or scar, build or break. Even a single sharp phrase can wound a parent more deeply than physical pain. True respect lies not in loud declarations of love, but in the tone of our everyday speech — in gentleness, patience, and gratitude. The Qur’an further instructs: “And lower to them the wing of humility out of mercy.” This image of lowering one’s “wing” captures the very essence of humility — to bow in affection, to serve without ego, and to speak with tenderness.
Old Age — Their Test, Our Opportunity-Many views old parents as a burden, but in truth, they are a divine test of character. Their dependence is not a trial for them, but for us. The Prophet Muhammad saw said:“May his nose be rubbed in dust — the one who finds his parents in old age, one or both, and yet does not enter Paradise through them.” Their frailty is our chance for salvation. Serving them, feeding them, or simply sitting beside them can open the gates of Paradise.
Remembering Their Sacrifices-No matter how high a child climbs in life, he stands upon the shoulders of his parents’ sacrifices. The sleepless nights of a mother, the tireless labor of a father, the quiet prayers whispered in the dark — these are debts no currency can repay.The Qur’an reminds us:
“We have enjoined upon man kindness to his parents. His mother carried him/her in hardship upon hardship.” Their love was never conditional. They stood by us when the world turned away. To forget them in their frailty is to forget our own roots.
Love Beyond Death-The bond between parent and child does not end with the grave. The Prophet Muhammad saw said:“When a person dies, his deeds end except for three: ongoing charity, beneficial knowledge, or a righteous child who prays for him.” A prayer whispered for one’s deceased parents travels beyond the veil of mortality. It becomes a light in their graves and a source of continuing mercy. To pray for them is to keep their memory alive in the most sacred way.
A World of Distraction, A Generation of Forgetfulness-Today’s world, with its constant noise, ambition, and self-centred pace, has produced a tragic paradox — parents surrounded by family, yet utterly alone. The same homes they built brick by brick have become places of isolation. Screens glow brighter than smiles, and conversations have turned to messages.Our elders sit quietly, longing for the warmth of a child’s presence, not their presents. They do not seek money, luxury, or recognition — they seek attention, kindness, and companionship. When they speak, they do not wish to be corrected, only to be heard. Their stories, repeated a hundred times, are not forgetfulness but a longing to relive moments when life still had meaning.Neglecting parents in their old age is one of the gravest moral crises of our times. It reflects a society that has lost its sense of gratitude. A culture that forgets its elders has no right to expect mercy from its youth.
Paradise Beneath Their Feet-The Prophet Muhammad saw proclaimed: “Paradise lies beneath the feet of mothers.” Beneath those tired, cracked feet lies a lifetime of love, sacrifice, and prayer. And beneath a father’s silent labour lies the shade that once sheltered our childhood. When a parent’s eyes well up because of a child’s indifference, those tears rise to the heavens, not the floor. They reach the Throne of the Most Merciful.
Let us, therefore, not wait for their absence to realize their worth. Love them in their presence. Sit beside them, listen, and serve them without condition. For whoever pleases his parents has pleased Allah — and whoever breaks their hearts has dimmed the light of his own destiny.
Dr. Fiaz Maqbool Fazili is a physician and columnist who writes on ethics, faith, and social concerns. He can be reached at drfiazfazili@gmail.com.
—
Senior Consultant Surgeon (Surgical Gastroenterology; Onco-

How Junk Foods lead to obesity and lifestyle diseases, opinion 13 October 2025
Junk Food Leads to Obesity and Lifestyle Diseases.